Sunday, February 17, 2008

Superman Has Entered The Building

On December 14th, 2005, I wrote a blog entry during an Orlando Magic road trip to New York and Dallas. This was Dwight Howard's rookie season; on the first game of that trip, Howard recorded 23 points and 13 rebounds in a win over the Knicks.

Here's part of that entry from two-plus years ago: The kid is an absolute monster, and he only gets better with each passing day. As [Magic television announcer] David Steele would say on the bus back to the airport later that night, Howard 'is going to save the franchise.'

Save the franchise? After watching the Slam Dunk contest at the NBA's All-Star Weekend in New Orleans the other night, I need to amend that statement.

Dwight Howard is going to save the National Basketball Association.

Does it need saving? As Orlando Sentinel columnist Jerry Greene noted this week, the latest Harris Interactive Poll shows that the NBA's popularity relative to other major college and pro sports has dropped once again -- tied for sixth with a 4 percent choice among those polled, a number that's down 60 percent over the last five years. That's tied with golf and college basketball, but trailing the NFL, baseball, college football, auto racing, and hockey (!). We've obviously come a long way from the days when "The NBA on NBC" was among the highest-rated programs on television each week.

Remember those days? Marv, the Czar, and Ahmad? Hannah Storm in the studio? I'm thinking of the early 90's, long before anyone had ever heard of Mixed Martial Arts or televised poker. The NBA was mainstream then; now, it's tied for sixth.

The reasons for pro basketball's decline in popularity are too numerous and complicated to lay out here. NASCAR has something to do with it; the proliferation of cable and satellite television and the Internet explosion probably counts, too. There's likely a socioeconomic factor as well -- a growing resentment towards young, obscenely wealthy professional athletes who don't seem to 'get it.' Whatever. All I know for sure is this:

What I saw on Saturday night was the most compelling thirty minutes of NBA-related coverage that I've witnessed since I left ESPN to move home to Orlando and join Sun Sports -- which, coincidentally, was almost five years ago. Dwight Howard, for anyone who missed it, owned the night.

He set the tone by dunking from behind the backboard -- something that I can write in ten words, but cannot possibly encapsulate for anyone who didn't see it. He raised the bar with the Superman Dunk -- and much like the Blind Dunk (Dee Brown), the Spud Dunk (Spud Webb), and the Free Throw Line Dunk (Jordan), Howard's effort instantly lept into one-line recognition status. And then, when merely showing up for the final round would have been enough to bury poor Gerald Green, Howard stunned us again by lofting a bounce pass to the rim, tapping the ball off the backboard with his left hand, and thundering home a dunk with his right.

It was ridiculous and magnificent. Sick and uplifting. Go back and watch the reactions from his peers -- check the looks on the faces of future Hall of Famers like Kobe Bryant and Jason Kidd -- and judge for yourself. They have no idea what to make of this wonder-child.

Let me help them: Dwight Howard is going to save the NBA.

He's not going to save the league purely because of his athleticism, which is freakish to the point of incredulity. He's going to save the league because he's an otherworldly athlete whose personality is such that even the most grizzled NBA observers -- the Charles Barkleys and Kenny Smiths of the world -- are drawn to him.

Did anyone listen to Kenny and Chuck gushing over Howard on Saturday night? Did you hear Barkley -- Barkley, of all people -- make the comment that Howard "is a great face for that franchise?" Did you hear Kenny Smith declare the contest "over" after the first round, noting that the earnest efforts of the other candidates -- and let's be honest, who cares about their names -- "wouldn't get it done?"

That doesn't happen solely because of athleticism. That happens because of personality. Howard is a magnet, the way Jordan and Magic were magnets, the way that, despite their spectacular skills, Kobe Bryant and Vince Carter and Tim Duncan are not. No knock on anyone in particular -- Magic, along with Larry Bird, saved the league once, Jordan elevated it into the mainstream, and guys like Lebron James have carried the flag admirably -- but they don't light the skies like Dwight Howard does.

In this lineage, the succession that covers my lifetime, there is Bird, Magic, Jordan, Lebron, and then Dwight. Honorable mention to Julius Erving for opening the airspace above the rim, and a purist's nod to the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs of this decade for bringing the team game into the conversation. But the royal blood is in Howard's veins.

Dwight Howard has already saved the Magic franchise. The new arena deal in Central Florida, complete with a written guarantee from the organization not to leave Orlando for at least 25 years without prohibitive financial penalties, can be at least partially laid at his feet.

Howard just saved the Slam Dunk contest. It's been written 100 times in the last two days, and you'll read it again next season, and the season after that.

His next feat? Dwight Howard is going to save the NBA. The league may never achieve the lofty prime-time status of the 1990's -- our sports universe may simply be too fractured for that -- but he's the future. He'll have some help from players like Chris Paul, Brandon Roy, Dwyane Wade, and a handful of other stars whose warmth and charisma match their supreme talents, but Howard is the key. The NBA has found the horse upon which to hitch its wagon.

Dwight Howard is going to save the league. And when his Hall of Fame biography is written, a magical Saturday night in New Orleans will be cited as the tipping point.

Labels:

11 Critiques:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. Do you know who is better than Howard? Lebron. Do you knoe who has a more magnetic personality than Howard? Lebron. Do you know who has done roughly a billion more things to save his franchise than Howard? Lebron. Howard is a nice player, but will never be better than a 2nd echelon guy. Thanks for the laughs though

2/19/2008 12:39 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everybody knows that LeBron James is and will be the face of the NBA for the next 10 years.

2/19/2008 2:59 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm surprised you left Kobe Bryant off of your lineage succession list.

2/19/2008 3:06 PM

 
Blogger Whit Watson said...

"Do you know who has done roughly a billion more things to save his franchise than Howard? Lebron."

Ummm...

Without Lebron, the Cavs reached the playoffs 13 times.

Without Lebron, the Cavs managed to get a $100 million arena built in downtown Cleveland.

What, exactly, did Lebron 'save'? And do you think there's any shot for the Magic to get their arena built were it not for Howard?

Lebron is a supreme talent. Nobody is arguing that. But to me, he's businesslike on the floor, a result of essentially being a professional basketball player since he was in 9th grade.

Howard, on the other hand, is clearly having fun. And while Lebron may be the "face" of the league for the next ten years -- a decision that has no doubt already been made by NBA Entertainment -- Dwight will save it.

He'll save it because the casual fan will take one look at him and say, "that guy looks like he's having a ball."

Can you say that about Lebron?

2/19/2008 7:13 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stop overreacting, for God's sake. Dwight Howard is a sick basketball player, and he put on an amazing show Saturday night. But now you're appointing him the savior of the NBA? Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

Here's a guy who still can't create his own offense, if you take away spacers like Hedo and Rashard. Think about it. He's got some nice moves, but can you consistently dump the ball to him in the post EVERY time you go down the court? The way you could with Shaq in his prime, Kareem, Hakeem, Wilt, etc.? Not even close. Most of Howard's points still come from him catching the ball in the right position and then having enough athleticism to know what to do with it. He can't create his own shot CONSISTENTLY the way a Duncan can.

And you want to appoint this kind of player the savior of the NBA? He's not even in the class of the elite big men of all-time yet. You bloggers/media types are all the same, so over-reactionary. Take a laxative, settle down, and wait a couple years.

2/19/2008 9:02 PM

 
Blogger Whit Watson said...

"Wait a couple years."

Best suggestion from that post. We'll see.

2/19/2008 10:21 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm with you on this one big, Howard is a specimen. We all knew this, BUT the day we hear about him getting pulled over for speeding, or a pot arrest or having a child out of wedlock is the day that Hillary Clinton is president.

Howard is how old we forget? He is an absolute stud whose coach does not run the offense through him. That is not his fault, he will be an all-time great and very soon. His character sets him apart, the character that the NBA wishes that Rasheed Wallace had.

Watson, I'll jump on this bandwagon right now and we can laugh about it later.

2/20/2008 12:00 AM

 
Anonymous the one who knows said...

ahhh, whit, you prove once again that you don't know a "whit" about basketball and you'll also never miss a chance to bash LBJ.

what is your problem, exactly? the cavs franchise was about to be sold and most likely moved before LBJ. read the book "the franchise" by REAL journalists pluto and windhorst. they show FACTS to prove that the cavs were gone from cleve. without LBJ.

as for your plainly ridiculous assertion about howard "clearly having fun" and LBJ not, well... i guess you would point to those great funny nike dwight commercials. oh, wait that was LBJ. well, howard clearly has lifted his team in jordan-esque ways to over-achieve. oh wait, LBJ again. oh and i guess the cavs had appeared in a nba finals before unlike the magic. oh wait, the cavs HAD NEVER BEEN IN THE FINALS 'til LBJ and the magic had been thanks to a guy called shaq. ever heard of him?

ok, i've clearly destroyed your beyond ludicrous premise, so how 'bout you apologize for writing this tripe and move on, eh? oh and stop writing about LBJ. you only make yourself look silly...

2/21/2008 2:13 AM

 
Anonymous Nick The Quick said...

I agree Whit, Dwight Howard did save this franchise and is indeed bringing the excitement back to the NBA. Plus he's a great guy for kids to look up to unlike many guys that let all the money get to their head. As far as all of your LeBron James lovers, take a chill pill. LeBron is great but Dwight Howards personality and athleticism over shadows him. Dwight is bringing back the excitement and dominance that guys like Tim Duncan lack.

2/25/2008 2:34 PM

 
Anonymous Steve B said...

"We all knew this, BUT the day we hear about him getting pulled over for speeding, or a pot arrest or having a child out of wedlock is the day that Hillary Clinton is president."

I'm honestly confused about that statement. Does the person who wrote that know that Howard actually did have a child out of wedlock? With a Magic cheerleader? And that he's tried to keep it as quiet as he can because of his so called perfect-Christian image? It's been in some newspaper but never major networks like ESPN. Howard never even announced it like a proud father, he only responded when asked about it and said he wanted to keep his personal life separate. I'm not trying to sound holier-than-thou, but since you brought up "not having a child out of wedlock" to prove Dwight's character, I thought, well....you might want to know he actually did have a child out of wedlock. The pot arrest might not be far behind.

3/06/2008 1:59 PM

 
Blogger Whit Watson said...

Steve B --

Good point. Maybe the author of that comment hadn't heard the news, which, as you point out, was kept very quiet...?

BTW, this post generated a surprising level of response, and the funny part is, the LBJ supporters came after me as if I'd called him a stiff. Which I didn't.

Howard is more fun to watch than Lebron, in my opinion. Both are unique talents, but Howard's childlike warmth will draw in a casual fan in a way that LBJ's cold-blooded efficiency will not. Hardcore basketball people will see greater value in LBJ -- and I won't argue that, yet -- but that wasn't the point. The concept of the "casual fan," and the enormous impact those fans have on the long-term success of any pro sports league, is something that I have written about in this space before. Apparently, that concept is either lost or ignored by those who decided to take shots at me instead.

Discuss.

WW

3/06/2008 4:05 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home