Watch Your Mouth
There are two reasons for this post.
One, Brady Ackerman was at the Sun Sports studio this week to tape our "Tailgate Overtime Recruiting Special," and he mentioned how much he enjoyed my previous post on BS sportscaster terms. As far as I'm concerned, that's demand from the readers.
Second, Dan Patrick spent a good two hours on ESPN Radio earlier in the week on a related topic, stemming from Senator Joe Biden's ill-advised characterization of fellow Senator Barack Obama as "articulate." As we've heard ad infinitum from the cable news talking heads, simply calling Obama "articulate" wouldn't necessarily qualify as an insult. It would actually be a statement of fact. Barack Obama was once the president of the Harvard Law Review, for Heaven's sake. Of course he's articulate. Joe Biden can't carry the man's jock, intellectually speaking. It was the full text of Biden's comments -- "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy" -- that made Biden sound like a clueless racist, despite the fact that the poor sap was trying to give his fellow Senator a compliment.
Interestingly, it was former ESPN personality Keith Olbermann -- like me, a Cornell graduate and former Sports Director at WVBR-FM in Ithaca -- who best "articulated" the problem when he said on Patrick's radio show, "it's the implication of surprise that makes it offensive." Biden's comment seemed to imply that he found Obama's razor-sharp intellect and commanding presence to be atypical - because, after all, he's black. That's the subtext, and that's why Biden found himself in twelve kinds of deep doo-doo immediately afterwards.
Dan and Keith spent quite a bit of time on this topic last week, applying it to the sports world, where the incessant media coverage provides ample opportunity for a coach, player, or team executive to place his foot in his mouth. Yet, in the many years that have passed since Al Campanis publicly dug his own professional grave with comments about the "necessities" for a coach or manager, you find very few Bidenesque fumbles in the public forum of sports. There are a couple of reasons for this.
First, sports figures are far more cautious with their public statements, in large part to the lessons learned after the Campanis-"Nightline" fiasco of 1987. It would be foolish to suggest that we've all become more worldly and tolerant now; racism does, in fact, exist, even in sports. But the advent of 24-hour coverage via TV, print, radio, and internet has placed a premium on judiciousness. It's made us stop and think before we speak. That's not a bad thing. If we think hard enough, we might learn something.
Second, the expansion of American sports into global markets, and the steady flow of foreign-born athletes into American leagues, has changed the landscape. As sports announcers, we don't have the luxury of drawing lines based on color or creed. The diversity that we see on a daily basis makes that impossible. If you cover Major League Baseball, you deal with white players, black players, Latin players, and Asian players. The NBA is a melting pot of players from Europe, Asia, Latin America, and all corners of the globe. Hockey? Euros, French-Canadians, Native Americans, African-Americans. If you can't handle that, you're not long for this business.
Sports are now global enterprises; we know no other reality. When I take my seven-year-old son to a Magic game, he sees an Orlando roster that includes players from Turkey, Serbia, Puerto Rico, Ft. Lauderdale, and everywhere in between. It's actually a convenient place for me to teach him lessons in diversity and acceptance, as powerful a laboratory as his public elementary school classroom, which is also a cross-section of America.
Coded terms like "articulate," "athletic," "overachieving," and the like often carry a racial subtext. This cannot be argued. However, I would postulate that those who follow sports in this country -- any sport, college or pro -- are receiving a crash course in the true meaning of diversity. It's a giant leap forward to watch a team play without considering the background of each athlete, but millions of fans do it every night. We don't care where the guy is from; it's irrelevant. That, in my mind, is one value that sports can teach us, if we're willing to accept the education. Being a sports fan doesn't guarantee a new level of awareness, but you've got to be pretty thick to develop prejudices when faced with multicultural rosters. San Antonio's star point guard is French; the best player in the NBA's Western Conference is German. This is reality, and there's not a damn thing wrong with it. I can watch Tony Parker and Dirk Nowitzki play all day.
In short, Senator Biden: take in a ballgame once in a while. It might do you some good.

9 Critiques:
Senator Biden has a world of experience which Senator Obama still lacks despite announcing his candidacy for the highest ofiice of the land. Senator Biden's comments were unfortunate, but it seems that these kind of sensitivities are warranted only to some minority groups. While a White Boys Club is considered racist, any other minority Boys Club is just fine.
2/11/2007 10:00 PM
Right on. You can think of a myriad of flashpoint incidents in sports history that forced people to think about race relations.
Just off the top of my head, I can recall John Carlos & Tommie Smith, Jackie Robinson's impact and subsequently honored position in baseball, outrage over comments by Campanis and Jimmy "The Greek", numerous events in Muhammad Ali's career, Joe Louis-Schmeling fights, Hank Aaron's pursuit of Ruth's home run record..
In this decade you've already had two black coaches making a Super Bowl (and obviously Dungy becoming the first to win it), Rush Limbaugh's comments & controversy on Donovan McNabb & Rex Grossman, and the Olympic skating hubub over Shani Davis.. the point is there's a million points in sports history where race relations get debated, discussed and evaluated.
In non-sports history, what events have put these issues in the front of people's minds? There's significantly fewer.
2/12/2007 10:32 AM
As to the first post: I completely agree that Senator Biden has a "world of experience which Senator Obama still lacks" -- which makes Biden's comments all the more inexcusable. The man has been in the United States Senate for 34 years. He should know better. And that was the point of the entry, as Jamie noticed: people who cover college and pro sports on a daily basis have no choice but to know better. Their careers depend on it.
Whit
2/12/2007 11:45 AM
We might still look at whether or not Senator Biden was malicious in his comment, which will bring us back to the issue of unnecessary sensitivities. We are not gonna reach a color blind society before we shed these types of sensitivities.
2/12/2007 7:04 PM
To be honest with you Whit, I think your comment of, "Joe Biden can't carry the man's jock, intellectually speaking" is an insult to Joe Biden who is not only a trained lawyer but a Constitutional expert. Granted that his comments on Obama was unfortunate, but all who know Biden know that he is not a racist. From the other hand, Obama, despite the media hype is not in the exclusive league of elites, at least not yet, to warrant such reverance. Yes, he is much more presentable than the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Carol Moseley Brown whose bagages are well known, and I think that's what Biden meant by the word "clean".
2/15/2007 9:22 PM
Thanks for the note, Matt.
Not that it's at all relevant to the bigger issue, but just to prove that I'm not throwing flippant comments out there...
Joseph Biden attended the University of Delaware and earned a law degree from Syracuse. Both are fine institutions of higher learning.
Barack Obama graduated from Columbia, attended Harvard law school (where he was the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review and graduated magna cum laude), and then taught Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago.
I grant you that the hype surrounding Obama is, in the absence of a public service record as lengthy as Biden's, something of a "cult of personality" at this point. In my view, that has quite a bit to do with the "implication of surprise" that Keith Olbermann pinpointed on the radio. However, none of us -- not even a three-decade Senator like Joseph Biden -- have anything on Obama when it comes to academic record and intellectual chops.
Do I think Biden's a racist? Again, no. But it's obvious from the response that this entry has generated that we still respond on a gut, emotional level when it comes to questions of race.
As an aside, the names you mentioned - Jackson, Sharpton, Brown - were unelectable, not because they are African-American, but because they are polarizing. Their candidacies for the presidency were derailed for the same reason that men like Dean and McCain lost traction when presented to the general population. Obama, on the other hand, at least appears to be "mainstream" enough to merit serious consideration, regardless of race. That's what makes him interesting to this observer.
Back to sports from now on, I think.
WW
2/15/2007 11:00 PM
Yes, let's go back to sports with one last note. If Obama was not an African-American we would not have had this discussion. Biden, for sure, deserves better.
2/15/2007 11:52 PM
Academic records of the type that Obama carries are not unique, and that is why the experience issue becomes relevant. Just a point of clarification, the presidency of Harvard Law Review is the type of honorary titles that successful busy lawyers have no time for. On another note, teaching Constitutional Law is a narrow portion of Comparative Laws of Nations, teaching which could be very significant on anybody's resume. As others have pointed out, if it was a clean white man (as clean as Obama) this exchange would have never taken place.
2/16/2007 11:15 AM
Mr. Watson has valid points, but in my view, on that one comment about Senator Biden not being able to carry the man's jock, has gone too far, and owes the senator an apology.
2/17/2007 1:26 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home